Pittsburgh Mayor Vows Non-Cooperation with ICE Enforcement
Pittsburgh Mayor Ed Gainey stated on Monday that his administration will not cooperate with federal immigration authorities in light of the Trump administration’s efforts to deport undocumented immigrants from the United States.
The mayor made a compelling argument that the intervention of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents would not effectively address the country’s immigration issues. He emphasized that instead of fostering a sense of unity, the agency’s deportations would only serve to instill fear and deepen divisions within communities.
According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Mayor Gainey stated, “I will not be working with ICE. My administration will not collaborate with ICE. We will take all necessary steps to create a more welcoming city.”
ICE is not going to end the situation of a failed immigration policy,” he added “It’s not going to do it.”
In November, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson made similar remarks, stating that the police in his city would also refuse to collaborate with ICE officials in the removal of undocumented immigrants. This bold stance reflects a growing trend among leaders in prominent blue cities who are taking a strong stand against such cooperation.
Mayor Johnson reassured the public with unwavering determination, asserting, “We will not yield or falter. Our principles shall endure steadfast and resolute.”
“We will stand up for the residents of this city because it’s important to understand that the attack from the president-elect, former President Trump, is not only aimed at new immigrants and undocumented families,” he emphasized. “His threats also extend to Black families.”
Catholic Charities faces criticism for video on dealing with ICE: ‘Defund’
Catholic Charities is under fire for a video that offers advice on how to handle encounters with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. The video, which has since been removed, received backlash for its content and approach.
The video, released by Catholic Charities of Fort Worth, Texas, aimed to provide guidance to individuals who may come into contact with ICE agents. However, it faced intense criticism for its perceived support of undocumented immigrants and its lack of concern for law enforcement.
Critics argue that the video’s messaging promotes non-compliance with ICE agents and encourages individuals to obstruct their work. They assert that this undermines the rule of law and puts both immigrants and law enforcement officers at risk.
The controversy surrounding the video has led to calls for Catholic Charities to be defunded. Critics argue that the organization should not receive taxpayer funding if it promotes resistance to law enforcement agencies.
In response to the backlash, Catholic Charities defended the video, stating that it was intended to educate individuals on their rights during encounters with ICE agents. The organization maintains that it does not condone illegal activity but seeks to protect the vulnerable and marginalized in society.
The video’s removal has not appeased critics, who believe that Catholic Charities should be held accountable for its actions. The debate continues as to whether the organization’s funding should be reconsidered in light of this controversy.
Last week, the board of commissioners in Douglas County, Colorado, approved a resolution endorsing the proposed plans.
Commissioner Kevin Van Winkle emphasized the Board’s commitment to upholding the United States Constitution and ensuring the well-being of the community. In a video discussing the resolution, he stated, “We take our oath seriously and strive to fulfill it every day.” He highlighted the safety concerns associated with illegal immigration, noting that migrants often become victims of crime and abuse.
Tom Homan, the border czar appointed by President Donald Trump, stood up in defense of the administration’s strategy for mass deportations on Sunday.
According to Homan, Congress has a responsibility to fulfill. He emphasized that they are simply carrying out the laws that were passed by Congress and signed by the president. Homan made it clear that if Congress disagrees with the current immigration enforcement, they have the power to amend the laws.
“The importance of conveying a clear message cannot be overstated. There are indeed consequences for entering our country illegally,” he emphasized. “If we fail to demonstrate these consequences, we will never be able to address the issue at our borders.”
Post Comment